Matt Cutts Ruins

SEO

Matt Cutts Ruins “Link Buying” Session at PubCon

Update: At Matt’s request, he wanted me to make it more clear to people that this entry was posted in the Humorous section. And indeed, this entry was 50% joke and 50% serious. Serious, only in the fact that I think some of the panelists’ presentations would have been a little different if Matt hadn’t been there. If anything, Rand’s presentation probably stuck the closest to what he was going to present, because it basically mimicked his link buying blog entry from earlier in the week. Oh, and lastly, this is just my opinion and impression of that session — which happens to be shared by many of the attendees I talked to.

As most SEO specialists know, Matt Cutts — aka Google Search King — hates paid links. In fact, he has an all out war against link brokers like PayPerPost and Text Link Ads.

Unlike other search marketing conferences, PubCon is known for teaching the darker side of SEO and SEM. It’s been called the DEF CON of webmaster conferences, which is exactly why it attracts Matt Cutts. Consider Matt the equivalent of a federal agent, but out in the open, wearing his Google sheriff’s badge.

One of the highlights of PubCon Las Vegas 2007 this year was the session on Link Buying — at least it was until Matt showed up. The headlining panel of speakers included experts like Rand Fishkin, Aaron Wall and Jim Boykin. However, once they saw Matt in the back of the room, the panelists were too afraid to talk about anything interesting or important in regards to link buying. The best example of this was when Jim Boykin stood up to give his presentation, and basically told everyone he didn’t have anything to say.

In the back of the room — as this picture clearly captured — Matt Cutts took out a candy bar and crushed it in the palm of his hand, obviously signaling to the panelists that they would be next if they said the wrong thing.

 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Filed under:
SEO

Tell us what you think

  • Paul Betts

    Phew!
    Perhaps my browser was playing was playing up, but I could have sworn I saw an image of the Dark Mark on page load-up.
    Anyway I am glad you have sorted out this matter out with Mr ‘Sectumsempra’ Cutts. The picture looked more like he was going for his forearm not the food.
    At great risk I am linking to my incoherent website.
    Oh how the “perverted fear of violence puts a smile on every face” :)

  • Mike

    I’m glad Google’s so pristine. Their content network is the biggest piece of xxxx and con game out there for unsuspecting advertisers.

  • http://www.brianchappell.com Brian Chappell

    @arnie ROFL

    Great post Jon. Made me laugh.

  • http://www.verticalmeasures.com Arnie

    I was going to post something clever and informative. But seeing Matt right above this post, makes me nervous.

  • http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ Matt Cutts

    Many thanks for making that more clear, Jon. I really liked your dry sense of humor, but just in case some folks didn’t get it, I appreciate you doing a quick update. :)

  • http://sitening.com Jon Henshaw

    Matt, it was definitely a joke. I’ll update the entry ;-)

  • http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/ Matt Cutts

    Hi, this is Matt Cutts.

    Jon Henshaw, I believe your post was joking. If you notice, the post was filed under “Humorous.”

    I often take powerbar-type stuff to conferences in case I’m not able to grab lunch. I was just sitting in the back of the room eating one and talking to a fellow conference member; I didn’t even know someone was taking my picture, and certain I wasn’t trying to eat my protein bar in any kind of aggressive way. ;)

    Jon, it looks like a few people have taken your post seriously, as if I was actually trying to intimidate someone by eating a candy bar. If you intended this post to be humorous, could you make that a little more clear for readers? :)

  • Karen Andrews

    good lord enough of this link buying mess. Google is going to continue to alienate themselves from webmasters if they keep up their threats. in the meantime, I am still buying links very carefully. I’ve also gone back to relevant link exchange which appears to work better than buying links.

  • http://www.sem-advance.com Clint Dixon

    Man am I glad my business doesn’t rely on anything from Google…

    Matt C is nothing but a puppet and if paid links could hurt websites then we could buy links to competitors and they would disappear..

    That won’t happen….

    Time for some common sense to be applied.

  • http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/22735 Paul McNamara

    Fishkin has a slightly different take on the matter, which you can read on my blog. He also didn’t see the candygram.
    Is Google’s Matt Cutts a PubCon party pooper?

  • http://www.seounique.com/blog Matt Ridout

    Brilliant post I must say, made me laugh a bit. They should ban Matt from such events in future lol, or rufuse him entry if he has any candy in his pockets lol

  • http://www.apogee-search.com Bill Leake

    Those of us up here at SES Chicago missed all the fun, alas. We had a couple of Google engineers in our session, but we still managed to point out some of the ten-mile wide swaths of gray in the paid link discussion (such as bundled pricing deals with traditional publishers that include “free dofollow” links on their web properties as part of the package).

  • http://sitening.com Jon Henshaw

    Linda, I’m not sure who is giving Jim heat, but I don’t think he’s ever been ill-prepared for a presentation. It’s my experience that he could talk about that stuff all day. In my opinion

  • http://www.getelastic.com Linda Bustos

    Boykin took some heat from bloggers for his lack of preparation, but I think you hit the nail on the head — how intimidating to have the Cuttster glaring right at you.

  • Anna Mouse

    Would a Ninja read his secret scroll to you in front of his enemy?

  • http://www.sitecreations.com/blog Scott Clark

    Guys guys guys. Just buy Matt an Ale-8-One to enjoy with his candy bar. I hear they sell it by the case mail-order (LOL)

  • http://www.terryreeves.com Terry Reeves – Mr Unkie to you

    There must be a high turnover in the SEO/SEM Industry. Though this does not explain some of the “old-timers” reactions to link buying. Google has only been threatening to penalize link buying for about four years now.

  • wheel

    That’s me sitting beside him. He’s demonstrating how he inserted the knife into Aaron’s back.

    (I’m kidding!)

  • http://www.jaankanellis.com Jaan Kanellis

    PPP bad, AdSense/AdWords good = hypocritical.

    I fear we are heading down the unavoidable path of no more free placements one day.

  • http://sitening.com Jon Henshaw

    Thanks Gab. The blog uses Textpattern and we didn’t use any special plugins for the sidebar

  • http://seoroi.com Gab Goldenberg

    I thought the picture and caption was great. Shame that the panel didn’t teach you anything new! Do you have any suggestions on paid links to share? BTW, I liked the Def Con link and also your sidebar presentation of post data is sweet! Is that custom or a public plugin?

  • http://sitening.com Jon Henshaw

    Well, I guess they can figure it out from either mining PPP list and/or simply reading the “this is a sponsored review…”

  • http://www.manishpandey.com Manish Pandey

    Hmm…watch out boys, here comes the momma…

    I can’t understand how can Google find if the review was a paid or not!

    For this the bloggers would have to keep few points in mind like not showing up those big banners of PPP or reviewme. Write posts about their niche. Review sites in their niche. Write a few non-review posts. Then let’s see how can Google find them?